S,ESWARA PRASAD,BALAJINAGAR,VISAKHAPATNAM v. G.JEETHANDRA KUMAR,ELURU,W.G.DT&ANR
FCA/80/2009 · 2025-05-06
Ninala Jayasurya, Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5396 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5396 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA k N D o .f- ! K O oo fLoiwt AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO FCA NO: 80 OF 2009 Appeal under Section19 Family Court Act aggrieved by order dated 27.01.1997 passed in FC OP. No. 221 of 1995on the file of Judge, Family Court, Visakhpatnam Between: S. Eswara Prasad, S/o late Veerappadu Working as Peon in MES CE Navy Pondaparthy R/o Balajinagar, Simhachalam, Visakhapatnam District.
...PETITIONER / APPELLANT AND
1. G.Jeethandra Kumar, S/o Venkat Ramaiah Gogunta post, Paddapadu Mandalam, Eluru Taluq,
2. Srungarapu Parvathi, W/o Eswara Prasad House hold duties Thotava Village, Boorja Mandalam, Srikakulam District R-1 Dismissed for default vide court order dated 29.01.2009 ...RESPONDENTS / RESPONDENTS
w Jl Counsel for the Appellants Counsel for the Respondents: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following:
: M/s D SANGEETHA REDDY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3526] WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.80 of 2009 Between: S.Eswara Prasad, S/o.late Veerappadu ... Appellant AND
1. Gundapaneni Jeethandra Kumar, S/o.Venkata Ramaiah
2. Srungarapu Parvathi, W/o.Eswara Prasad (Appeal against respondent No.1 stands dismissed, vide
Order dated 29.1.2009) ... Respondents Counsel for the Appellant Counsel for the Respondents ; Ms.D.Sangeetha Reddy The Court made the following JUDGMENT: {per NJS,J) It is submitted on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellant that though a letter has been addressed seeking instructions from the appellant, no instructions are received so far. appellant is not interested in pursuing the appeal. It appears that the Hence, the Family Court Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. However, the appellant is at liberty to seek reopening of the appeal, if anything survives for adjudication. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if SD/- E KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR
4. any, shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The Judge, Family Court, Visakhpatnam.
2. One CC to M/s D Sangeetha Reddy, Advocate [OPUC
3. Three CD Copies psr
f- PSR HIGH COURT DATED:07/05/2025
ORDER A 2 5 JUL 2025 ^m FCA.No.80 of 2009 DISMISSING THE FCA FOR NON PROSECUTION