IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 749 of 2023 Ramu Oraon, S/o Budhwa Oraon, R/o Chama, PO & PS-Bukru, District-Ranchi … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi 3. The Circle Officer, Kanke, Ranchi … … Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Mahesh Kumar Mahto, Adv. For the Respondents : Mr. Prashant Kumar Rai, AC to SC(L&C)-I ----- 05/04.02.2025 The present writ petition has been filed for issuance of direction upon the concerned respondent to upload the entry of Register-II with respect to the petitioner’s land appertaining to Khata No. 75 of Mouza-Chama, Thana No. 55, PS-Kanke, District- Ranchi measuring an area of 8 acres 88½ decimals which was earlier recorded in the name of his predecessors-in-interest namely, Mangra, Litgu, Sukhram, Chamra Oraon in the online portal of the Government of Jharkhand and rent receipts were issued till the financial year 2019-20, however, entry of the said land has been deleted from the said online portal without any cogent reason. Further prayer has been made for issuance of direction upon the concerned respondent to issue rent receipts for the aforesaid lands in favour of the petitioner. 2. Prashant Kumar Rai, AC to SC (L&C)-I appearing on behalf of the respondents, refers to paragraph nos. 9, 10 & 11 of the counter affidavit dated 27.04.2023 filed on behalf of the respondent nos. 2 and 3, which read as under: “9. That it is humbly stated and submitted that in context of the above, that pursuant to the representation made 2 W.P.(C). No. 749 of 2023 by the petitioner, Circle Officer, Kanke issued letter to Additional Collector, Ranchi regarding fault in the Online Register-II of the petitioner’s land. 10. That it is humbly stated and submitted that in furtherance to the same, the fault has been rectified/corrected and in view of the same, the grievances of the petitioner have been redressed. 11. That it is important to mention here that now the petitioner can apply for issuance of rent receipt against the land in question.” 3. It is thus submitted that the grievances raised by the petitioner in the present writ petition have been redressed. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the aforesaid statements made in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent nos. 2 and 3, there is no need to further proceed in the matter. 5. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Manish