Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53935 (BOM)

PANDHARI DAYARAM ATKARI v. BABITA SHRIDHAR UIKEY AND OTHERS

WP/4833/2025 · 2025-08-22

Shri Prafulla S Khubalkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

23.wp.4833.25 1/1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.4833 of 2025 Pandhari Dayaram Atkari vs. Babita Shridhar Uikey and others =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Mr. A.A. Dhawas, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mrs. Kavita Bhondge, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.2 to 5. CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J. DATE : 22 nd AUGUST, 2025. Heard Mr. A.A. Dhawas, learned Counsel for the petitioner. 02. Although, the petitioner has challenged interim order passed by respondent No.2-Additional Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur, the learned Counsel for the petitioner restricts his prayer to a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the appeal finally. 03. Having regard to the contentions advanced, the writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent No.2-Additional Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur Division, Nagpur to decide the appeal bearing V.P.A. Appeal No.33/2025-26 (Babita Shridhar Uikey vs. Additional Collector, Bhandara and others), preferably within a period of four weeks from today. JUDGE *sandesh