Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53934 (ALL)

NAMAN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/9271/2025 · 2025-05-07

Vivek Kumar Birla, Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar Judicial

Special Leave Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:74886-DB Court No. - 43 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9271 of 2025 Petitioner :- Naman Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Umair Alam Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J. Hon'ble Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J. 1. Heard Sri Umair Alam, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Rahul Asthana, learned AGA appearing for the State respondents. 2. Present petition has been filed seeking to quash the impugned first information report dated 01.03.2025, registered as case crime no.28 of 2025, under Section 70(2), 127(2), 61(2), 137(2) BNS and 5/6 POCSO Act, Police Station Admapur, District Amroha and further not to arrest the petitioner pursuant to said FIR. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner herein is not named in the FIR. 4. We find that the present petition is not maintainable in the light of judgement of Hon'ble Apex Court passed in SLP (Criminal) No. 762 of 2020 (Hukum Chand Garg and others vs. State of U.P. and others) decided on 7.2.2022. 5. That apart, learned AGA pointed out that accused Harshit and Kunal have been arrested in the present case and chargesheet no. 37 of 2025 has also been forwarded on 26.04.2025 against them. 6. Present petition is accordingly dismissed as not maintainable. Order Date :- 8.5.2025 Nitendra Digitally signed by :- MADHURIMA GARG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad