Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53933 (AP)

Pullagura Prabhavathi v. The state of A.P

WP/28143/2025 · 2025-10-13

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010530322025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 28143/2025 Between: 1. PULLAGURA PRABHAVATHI, W/O. PULLAGURA ABRAHAMU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O.8-192, JALADI, ELADAPADU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF A P, ., REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RURAL OFFICE, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DIST. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, YEDLAPAD, PALNADU DITSTRICT, PALNADU. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M.CHARULATHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue an appropriate writ, order (or) direction more particularly on in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent No. 1 to 3 in not taking investigation seriously by not registering FIR and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 appropriately to register FIR and to provide necessary protection to the petitioner and her son.” 2. Heard Ms.M.Charulatha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 2 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that they have not received any representation from the petitioner to proceed on the petition to enquire into the matter for registration of any case. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that they have sent a representation to the DSP and also to the Station House Officer on 25.09.2025. 5. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is permitted to approach the police and submit a fresh representation to the police. On receiving such representation, the police are directed to act in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:14.10.2025 ASR 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.28143 of 2025 Dt.14.10.2025 Asr