RAJPAL SINGH v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE DISTT HARIDWAR
WPMS/1137/2025 · 2025-05-02
Ravindra Maithani
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5393 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5393 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS S1- 46
WPMS No.1137 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
Mr. Avneesh Khanduri, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Narein Dutt, Standing Counsel for the State. The petitioner claims that despite orders of this Court dated 01.11.2018, passed in WPPIL No.206 of 2018, Rajpal Singh Vs. State of Uttarakhand and Others, (“the PIL”) encroachment has been made on the land of village Dharampur, District Haridwar. He would submit that post decision of the PIL, once the encroachment was removed, but again it has been encroached upon. For enforcing an order passed in a PIL, a subsequent writ petition may not be entertained. Therefore, there is no reason to make any interference in this writ petition. The petitioner may seek enforcement of the order passed in the PIL by filing appropriate application. With the above observation, the petition stands disposed of, accordingly.
(Ravindra Maithani J.)
02.05.2025 RV