APHC010045772021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 3018/2021 Between: 1. MALLAVARAPU SOMARAJU,, S/O DHARMALINGAM, AGED 57 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O. CHOPPARAMANNAGUDEM VILLAGE, KOYYALAGUDEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. MALLAVARAPU SUBRAHMANYAM,, S/O DHARMALINGAM, AGED 64 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O. CHOPPARAMANNAGUDEM VILLAGE, KOYYALAGUDEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. MALLAVARAPU RAMA KRISHNA, , S/O DHARMALINGAM, AGED 54 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O. CHOPPARAMANNAGUDEM VILLAGE, KOYYALAGUDEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT ELURU. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, JANGAREDDYGUDEM CIRCLE POLICE STATION, JANGAREDDYGUDEM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE STATE HOUSE OFFICER, KOYYALAGUDEM POLICE STATION, KOYYALAGUDEM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. SMT NONDU SRI LAKSHMI, W/O. KALYAN, AGED 33 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.7-27-11, MAHALAKSHMI NAGAR, TADEPALLI GUDEM 2 VILLAGE AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in tl e nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents, particularly 4th respondent at the instance of 5th respondent in repeatedly insisting petitioners to appear before the 4th respondent police station and insisting petitioners to vacate from the lands of Ac. 3.00 cents, Ac. 0.75 cents and Ac. 0.75 cents covered by Sy. No- 66 of Chopparamannagudem village in Koyyalagudem Mandal of West Godavari District by settling the civil disputes in O.S.No.140 of 2020 on the file of court of learned Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Jangareddygudem ani yield to the demands of 5th respondent, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without any authority of law and volative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to in7terfere in any manner with petit ioners' life, personal liberty and said property and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 4th respondent not to insist the petitioners to appear before his authority nor insist him to vacate from the agricultural land of Ac. 3.00 cents, Ac. 0.75 cents and Ac. 0.75 cents covered by Sy. No- 66 of. Chopparamannagudem village in Koyyalagudem Mandal of West Godavari District belonged to the petitioners 1 to 3, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 3018 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents particularly 4th respondent at the instance of 5th respondent in repeatedly insisting petitioners to appear before the 4th respondent police station and insisting petitioners to vacate from the lands of Ac.3.00 cents Ac.0.75 cents and Ac.0.75 cents covered by Sy.No.66 of Chopparamannagudem Village in Koyyalagudem Mandal of West Godavari District by settling the civil disputes in O.S.No.140 of 2020 on the file of court of learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Jangareddygudem and yield to the demands of 5th respondent as illegal, irregular, irrational, without any authority of law and volative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner with petitioners’ life personal liberty and said property …” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that in the light of the interim order passed by this Court vide Order dated 09.02.2021, the respondent- police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioners and unofficial respondent. 3. Sri P. Nagaraju, learned counsel representing Sri Nimmagadda Satyanarayana, learned counsel for the petitioners, would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4 4. In that view of the matter, this Writ Petition is disposed of making the interim order as absolute. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 07.10.2025. VNS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No. 3018 of 2021 Dated.07.10.2025 VNS 714 6