Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38096 WP No. 28639 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 28639 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
SRI SHIVALINGA S/O LATE SRI. VEERABHADRAIAH AGE ABOUT 43 YEARS R/AT WARD NO. 20, AMBEDKAR NAGARA HOLENARASIPURA TALUK, HASSAN - 573 211. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUPRITHA K.H, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560 001 REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SERETARY. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MANDYA DISTRICT MANDYA - 571 401. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER PANDAVAPURA TALULK MANDYA DISTRICT MANDYA - 571 434. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38096 WP No. 28639 of 2025
4. THE TAHASILDAR KRISHNARAJAPETE TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT MANDYA - 571 426. 5. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND REACORDS (ADLR), KRISHNARAJAPETE TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA - 571 426. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA)
THIS WP IS FILED UDNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS NO. 3 AND 4 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DTD 09.09.2025 VIDE ANNX-F AND G RESPECTIVELY AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for all the respondents. 2. It is the contention of the petitioner that when online application for phodi and durast was made by the
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38096 WP No. 28639 of 2025 petitioner, the computer has generated information that there is RTC mismatch and therefore, the application is not accepted online. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has been informed that there is a mismatch between the RTC and Akarbandh and therefore, the petitioner will have to approach the Assistant Commissioner, Pandavapura, to rectify the mistake. If such is the information given to the petitioner, this Court cannot direct the Tahsildar to accept the application for phodi without rectifying the mistake. 3. Consequently, the writ petition stands disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Assistant Commissioner, Pandavapura Taluk and get the mistake rectified in accordance with law.
If such application/petition/appeal is filed by the petitioner, the Assistant Commissioner shall pass necessary orders after issuing notice to all concerned, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of three months from the date when which the application is filed. - 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38096 WP No. 28639 of 2025 Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9 CT: BHK