Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:106404 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 14049 of 2025 Petitioner :- Crossing Republik Infrastructure Apartment Owners Association And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shivam Agarwal,Tanu Shree Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Jagdish Singh,Manu Ghildyal,Tejasvi Misra,Vinod Kumar Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking following main prayers:- "(I) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus against respondent no.3 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 18.01.2025 in consonance with the Minutes of Meeting of the General Body Meeting dated 24.11.2024 and 09.01.2025. (II) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus against the respondent no.3 to put the election of the RWA at abeyance till the order is being passed on the representation of the petitioner dated 18.01.2025 in consonance with decision of the GBM dated 24.11.2024 and 09.01.2025. (III) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus against the respondent no. 4 to appoint an administrator for the management of the petitioner society till the election is being conducted. (IV) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus against the respondent no. 5 to provide adequate security for conducting free and fair election for the board of management of the RWA." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that his representations dated 18.01.2025 and 15.02.2025, which are pending before respondent no.3, may be directed to be decided in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State- respondent vehemently opposed the petition on merits, but has not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. 4. Heard Sri Shivam Agrawal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Vijay Prakash Mishra, learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of the State-respondent no.1, Sri Manu Ghildyal, learned counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of respondent no.4, perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection has been made on behalf of learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State- respondent. The respondent no.3-Deputy Registrar, Firms, Societies & Chits, U.P., Ghaziabad is directed to decide the pending representation/s of the petitioner, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks from today. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. . (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Order Date :- 7.7.2025 Atul Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad