Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53903 (AP)

BOMMIREDDIPALLI TRINADHA VENKATA RAMA RAO v. UNION OF INDIA

WP/19307/2025 · 2025-10-13

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010382102025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 19307/2025 Between: 1. BOMMIREDDIPALLI TRINADHA VENKATA RAMA RAO, S/O (LATE) B.V.V.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC LAO AND SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND ACQUISITION), OFFICE OF THE LAO CUM SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, LA, VISAKHAPATNAM, R/O D.NO.44-41-3/2, 2ND FLOOR, NANDAGIRI NAGAR, AKKAYYAPALEM VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110001. 2. THE DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, REP. BY THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, ZONAL OFFICE, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Certiorari or Mandamus declaring the impugned notices dated 16.07.2025 issued under Section 50 of the PMLA, 2002 by the 2nd respondent as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently quash the same and to declare that no action can be taken under the PMLA in respect of properties which are already the subject matter of pending confiscation 2 JS,J W.P.No.19307/2025 proceedings under the 1944 Ordinance, particularly when stayed by the competent court and pass an order restraining the respondents from taking any coercive steps pursuant to the said notices and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in pursuant to the impugned notices dated 16.07.2025 issued by the 2 Respondent under Section 50 of the PMLA and direct that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner and his family members pursuant to the said notices Pending final disposal of the writ petition, and to pass such IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct that the matter be listed under the caption “For Being Mentioned” to clarify and incorporate the oral direction of this Hon’ble Court not to take coercive steps against the petitioner and his family members; and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NARASIMHA REDDY. G . L Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. JOSYULA BHASKARA RAO ( SC FOR E D ) 3 JS,J W.P.No.19307/2025 The Court made the following ORDER: In pursuance of the letter, dated 13.10.2025, addressed to the Registrar (Judicial), learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 14.10.2025 KAS 4 JS,J W.P.No.19307/2025 240 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 19307/2025 Dated: 14.10.2025 KAS