APHC010333452004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 20390/2004 Between: 1. G.NAGA RAJU, KURNOOL DISTRICT, S/O G.PENCHALAIAH, EX- CLEANER, E-406285, APSRTC YEMMIGANUR DEPOT, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. DEPOT MANAGER APSRTC KURNOOL DISTRICT ANR, APSRTC, YEMMIGANUR DEPOT, KURNOOL DISTRICT 2. THE HONBLE LABOUR COURT, ANANTHAPUR, REP.BY ITS PRESIDING OFFICER, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the award passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court in ID No.44/2000, dated 17-3-2003 on the file of the Labour Court, Anantapur which was published vide G.O.RtNo.970, dated 30- 05-2003 and also the Proceedings of the Depot Manager, APSRTC, Yemmiganur, Kurnool District vide No.P4/745(5)/98-YMGRm dated 20-5-1999 and declare the same as illegal, arbitrary and violative of the principles of natural justice and further directed the respondents to re-instate the petitioner into service with continuity of service and full back wages and pass such other and further order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case IA NO: 1 OF 2004(WPMP 26685 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the early hearing of the Writ Petition and pass such other and further order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P RAGHAVENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LABOUR 2. P VINAYAKA SWAMY (SC FOR APSRTC) The Court made the following: ORDER: On 12.07.2024, there was no representation for the petitioner and the matter has been listed finally. Despite such direction, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 22nd September, 2025 RKS