- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44423-DB CCC No. 263 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 263 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SRI G RAMA MOHANA S/O LATE NARAYANA BHAT AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 2. SRI G. JAYAPRAKASH S/O LATE NARAYANA BHAT AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 3. SRI G. ARAVINDA S/O LATE NARAYANA BHAT AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS 4. SRI G.N. VISHWESHWARA S/O LATE NARAYANA BHAT AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT LADA HOUSE MONTEPADAVU MANJANADI VILLAGE MANGALURU DAKSHINA KANNADA PIN: 574 153 …COMPLAINANTS (BY SRI. SHIVARAMA BHAT O., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by AMBIKA H B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44423-DB CCC No. 263 of 2025 AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001 2. SRI MULLAI MUHILAN M.P. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER D.K. MANGALORE - 575 001 3. SRI HARSHAVERDHANA S.J. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MANGALURU SUB-DIVISION 2ND FLOOR TALUK ADMINISTRATIVE SOUDHA MANGALURU - 575 001. 4. SRI PRASHANTHA V.PATILA TAHASILDAR MANGALURU TALUK MANGALURU D.K. - 574 219 …ACCUSED (BY SRI. K.S. HARISH, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT, 1964 READ WITH UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN PRAYS THAT THE HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED AND PUNISH HIM APPROPRIATELY FOR HAVING COMMITTED THE CONTEMPT OF COURT BY DISOBEYING /NOT - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44423-DB CCC No. 263 of 2025 COMPLYING THE ORDER DATED 05.03.2024 PASSED BY LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HONBLE COURT IN WP NO.6872/2024 (KR-LG) VIDE ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. Notice has been issued in the appeal (WA No.417/2025) preferred against the order, the disobedience of which is alleged. Accordingly, the present complaint is closed at this stage with liberty to the complainant to file afresh, subject to the outcome of the appeal. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE YKL/ List No.: 1 Sl No.:24.1