Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53894 (KAR)

SRI DINESH D v. SMT GOWRAMMA

RPFC/62/2021 · 2025-07-22

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27624 RPFC No. 62 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV. PET FAMILY COURT NO.62 OF 2021 BETWEEN: 1. SRI DINESH D AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, S/O LATE DODDAIAH R/AT JAYANTHI GRAMA BIDARE POST SHIVAMOGGA TALUK-577 222. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIJAYA KRISHNA BHAT M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. GOWRAMMA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, W/O LATE DODDAIAH R/AT JAYANTHI GRAMA BIDARE POST SHIVAMOGGA TALUK-577 222. 2. SRI RAVI D AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, S/O LATE DODDAIAH EMPLOYEE IN MALNAD ALINESE CASTING PVT. LTD. R/AT VEERABHADRA COLONY HASODI POST SHIVAMOGGA TALUK-577 222. …RESPONDENTS (RESPONDENTS SERVED) Digitally signed by H K HEMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27624 RPFC No. 62 of 2021 THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 09.06.2021 PASSED IN CRL.MISC.NO.106/2017 BY THE FAMILY COURT, SHIVAMOGGA, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner stating that the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled and they are residing together, and hence, the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition. Memo is taken on record. Accordingly, the Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. All pending IAs. in this petition shall stand closed. Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE hkh. List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11