Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53894 (CHH)

RAM NARAYAN NISHAD v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/12188/2025 · 2025-10-16

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:51904 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 12188 of 2025 1. Ram Narayan Nishad S/o. Late Mahesh Nishad, Aged About 62 Years R/o. Village Gujra, Tahsil Bhakhara, Dist. Dhamtari (C.G.) 2. Harinarayan Sahu S/o. Late Ramkishan Aged About 62 Years R/o Village Gatapar, Tahsil Bhakhara, Dist. Dhamtari (C.G.) 3. Tulsi Ram Yadav S/o. Shri Panchu Ram, Aged About 63 Years R/o Village Telinsaji, Post Demar, Tahsil And Dist. Dhamtari (C.G.) 4. Kirtan Ram, S/o. Shri Mehattar Ram Aged About 63 Years R/o Village Boridkala, Shantipur Tahsil Gurur, Dist. Dhamtari (C.G.) 5. Anand Ram @ Moti Ram S/o Late Bisahu Ram Sori Aged About 63 Years R/o. Village Bohardih Budhadevpara, Ward No. 8, Tahsil Gurur, Dist. Balod (C.G.) 6. Indrajeet S/o. Shri Kanhaiyalal Sahu Aged About 62 Years R/o. Village Chiraigodi, Jamgaon, Tahsil Gurur, Dist. Balod (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Dept. Of General Administration, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Secretary, Dept. Of Finance, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Secretary, Dept. Of Water Resources, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur (C.G.) 4. Chief Engineer, Mahanadi Pariyojana, Dept. Of Water Resources, Tahsil And Dist. Raipur (C.G. 5. Executive Engineer, Water Management Division, Rudri, Dhamtari (C.G.) 2 6. Executive Engineer, Mahanadi Water Reserve Project Division Code No. 2, Rudri, Dist. Dhamtari (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. N. N. Roy, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Aditya Tiwari, Panel Lawyer (Hon’ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas) Order on Board 17/10/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the issue involved in this writ petition has already been decided by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh [WPS No. 3870 of 2021 (decided on 30.09.2022)], therefore, the present writ petition may be disposed of in the same terms. 2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition also deserves to be disposed of in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel (supra). 3. Accordingly, the writ petition (s) stands disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Raju RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Digitally signed by RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Date: 2025.10.27 17:53:58 +0530