Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53894 (AP)

T. VENKATARATNAM NAIDU & ANO. v. PRL. SECY., HOME DEPT. & 4 ORS.

WP/35084/2017 · 2025-12-04

Battu Devanand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010854562017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 35084/2017 Between: 1. T. VENKATARATNAM NAIDU & ANO., S/O. T. KRISHNAMURTHY, AGE:58YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE, R/O. K.YENUGUPALLY (V), P GANNAVARAM (M), EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. TOLETI NAGESWARA RAO,, S/O. T. VENKATARATNAM NAIDU @ VENKATA RATNAM, AGE 36 YEARS, OCC.AGRICULRURE, R/O.K YENUGUPALLY (V), P. GANNAVARAM (M), EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. PRL SECY HOME DEPT 4 ORS, HOME DEPT., SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS,VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAKINADA, E.G.DISTRICT. 3. THE S H O P GANNAVARAM P S, P. GANNAVARAM MANDAL, E.G.DIST. 4. P VEERA BABU SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, P GANNAVARAM P.S., E.G.DIST. 5. AKULA ADINARAYANA BABI, S/O. BUCHAYYA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCCUPATION: BUSINESS, R/O. PEDDAVEEDI, AMBAJIPETA (V &M), EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus (i) declaring the action of the respondent authorities in interfering with the possession of the petitioners land an extent of Ac.0.50 cents Sy.No.152/9 situated at K.Yenugupalli (v), P. Gannavaram (m), East Govadari District including in Civil disputes as arbitrary, illegal, highhanded, unconstitutional, (ii) direct the 2nd respondent to conduct enquiry on the complaints made against the respondent No.4 and 5 by the 1st petitioner on 10-07-2017 and 07-08-2017 and take necessary action against them, consequently direct the respondent authorities not to interfere with the civil disputes pending between the 1st petitioner and 5th respondent in respect of the above land an extent of Ac.0.50 cents Sy.No.152/9 situated at K.Yenugupalli (V), P. Gannavaram (M), East Govadari District the petitioners from the land and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 43596 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to conduct enquiry on the complaints made against the Respondent No.4 and 5 by the 1st petitioner on 10-07-2017 and 07-08-2017 and take necessary action against them pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. A T PRABHAKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION No.35084 of 2017 ORDER: There is no representation for the petitioners on 26.09.2025 and accordingly, this writ petition is posted today under the caption for “dismissal”. 2. Today also there is no representation for the petitioners. It appears the petitioners have no interest to prosecute the case. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND Date: 05.12.2025 PGR THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND W.P.No.35084 of 2017 Date: 05.12.2025 PGR