CWP-12985-2025 (O&M) 133 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Anil Kumar State of Haryana CORAM: HON HON Present:- Mr. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional AG Haryana with Mr. Gaurav Bansal, Advocate and Mr. Karan Jindal, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. Ms. Ashna Singh, Advocate for respondent SUDHIR SINGH Present Writ in the nature of the petitioner for allotment of plot to them under the oustees of his land, which has been acquired as per the Oustees rehabilitation and 2. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted liberty to file a 2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH Date of decision: versus Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Mr. Harinder Singh Sandhu, Advocate for Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional AG Haryana with Mr. Gaurav Bansal, Advocate and Mr. Karan Jindal, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate and Ms. Ashna Singh, Advocate for respondent ***** SUDHIR SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present Writ Petition herein, inter alia in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to the petitioner for allotment of plot to them under the oustees of his land, which has been acquired as per the Oustees rehabilitation and Resettlement of Land Owners. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted liberty to file a 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12985-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: May 07, 2025 ….Petitioner ….Respondents SUDHIR SINGH ALOK JAIN Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional AG Haryana with Mr. Gaurav Bansal, Advocate and Mr. Karan Jindal, Advocate for respondent No.1 – State. Ms. Ashna Singh, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. inter alia, is for issuance of a Writ the respondents to decide the claim of the petitioner for allotment of plot to them under the oustees category in lieu of his land, which has been acquired as per the Oustees Policies for of Land Owners. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted liberty to file a fresh representation 2 2025 (O&M) , 2025 Petitioner s Writ decide the claim of category in lieu for After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner representation MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.05.12 10:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CWP-12985-2025 (O&M) 2 of 2 before the concerned authority, for redressal of his grievance, and the same may be decided, expeditiously. 3. On the other hand, on advance service of copy of petition, learned counsels for the respondents appear and submit that in case, the petitioner moves a representation, the same will be looked into by the concerned authority and it shall take decision either way, on such representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law. 4. Without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to make a fresh representation before the concerned authority, for redressal of his grievance, and authority concerned shall consider such representation of the petitioner and pass an appropriate reasoned order, in accordance with law, at the earliest, preferably within a period of 06 weeks from the date of filing of such representation. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE May 07, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.05.12 10:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment