1 APHC010691962025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 35576/2025 Between: 1. SATTIRAJU NARASIMHAM, S/O VENKATA RATNAM, AGE 62 YEARS, OCC RETD. ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER OF SBI, R/O PLOT NO.404, FLAT NO.102, ROAD NO.2/2, SREE RAVI NILAYAM, MATRUSRI NAGAR, HAFEEZPET, MIYAPUR, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE. 2. PRATHIBHA MAURYA,, D/O PREM NARAYANA MAURYA, AGE 46 YEARS, OCC SBI BRANCH MANAGER, R/O G/1410, FAIZABAD ROAD, NIKAT SHIV MANDIR, PAISAR, NAWABGANJ, BARABANKI DISTRICT, UTTAR PRADESH STATE. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522238 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE DGP, CRIME INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT (CID), MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 522503 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CID PS, A.P., MEDICAL COLLEGE BACKSIDE, KANNAVARITHOTA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522034 ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 in not considering the representations of the petitioners dt 26.09.2025 submitted in connection with the F.I.R.No.69/2022, dt 08.12.2022 registered under Sec.420, 406, 409, 469, 471, r/w 120-B IPC and Sec.13 (2) of PC Act, 1988 as illegal, arbitrary and consequentially direct the respondents 2 and 3 to consider and dispose of the petitioners representation dt 26.09.2025, in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to consider the representations of the petitioners dt: 26.09.2025 submitted in connection with the F.I.R.No.69/2022, dt: 08.12.2022, pending disposal of the main writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. AISHWARYA NAGULA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 3 APHC010691932025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 35591/2025 Between: 1. SATTIRAJU NARASIMHAM,, S/O VENKATA RATNAM, AGE 62 YEARS, OCC RETD. ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER OF SBI, R/O PLOT NO.404, FLAT NO.102, ROAD NO.2/2, SREE RAVI NILAYAM, MATRUSRI NAGAR, HAFEEZPET, MIYAPUR, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE. 2. PRATHIBHA MAURYA,, D/O PREM NARAYANA MAURYA, AGE 46 YEARS, OCC SBI BRANCH MANAGER, R/O G/1410, FAIZABAD ROAD, NIKAT SHIV MANDIR, PAISAR, NAWABGANJ, BARABANKI DISTRICT, UTTAR PRADESH STATE ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522238 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE DGP, CRIME INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT (CID), MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.522503 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CID PS, A.P., MEDICAL COLLEGE BACKSIDE, KANNAVARITHOTA, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522034 ...RESPONDENT(S): 4 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 in not considering the representations of the petitioners dt 26.09.2025 submitted in connection with the F. I. R. No.66/2022, dt 08.12.2022 registered under Sec.420, 406, 409, 467, 471, r/w 120-B IPC and Sec.13 (2) of PC Act, 1988 as illegal, arbitrary and consequentially direct the respondents 2 and 3 to consider and dispose of the petitioners representation dt 26.09.2025, in the interest of justice and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to consider the representations of the petitioners dt: 26.09.2025 submitted in connection with the F.I.R.No.66/2022, dt: 08.12.2022, pending disposal of the main writ petition and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. AISHWARYA NAGULA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. AISHWARYA NAGULA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 5 APHC010691972025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 35593/2025 Between: 1. SATTIRAJU NARASIMHAM, S/O VENKATA RATNAM, AGE 62 YEARS, OCC RETD. ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER OF SBI, R/O PLOT NO.404, FLAT NO.102, ROAD NO.2/2, SREE RAVI NILAYAM, MATRUSRI NAGAR, HAFEEZPET, MIYAPUR, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE. 2. PRATHIBHA MAURYA,, D/O PREM NARAYANA MAURYA, AGE 46 YEARS, OCC SBI BRANCH MANAGER, R/O G/1410, FAIZABAD ROAD, NIKAT SHIV MANDIR, PAISAR, NAWABGANJ, BARABANKI DISTRICT, UTTAR PRADESH STATE ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522238 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE DGP, CRIME INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT (CID), MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 522503 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CID PS, A.P., MEDICAL COLLEGE BACKSIDE, KANNAVARITHOTA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522034 ...RESPONDENT(S): 6 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 in not considering the representations of the petitioners dt 26.09.2025 submitted in connection with the F.I.R.No.68/2022, dt 08.12.2022 registered under Sec.420, 406, 409, 467, 471, r/w 120-B IPC and Sec.13 (2) of PC Act, 1988 as illegal, arbitrary and consequentially direct the respondents 2 and 3 to consider and dispose of the petitioners representation dt 26.09.2025, in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to consider the representations of the petitioners dt: 26.09.2025 submitted in connection with the F.I.R.No.68/2022, dt: 08.12.2022, pending disposal of the main writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. AISHWARYA NAGULA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. AISHWARYA NAGULA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 7 APHC010691982025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 35614/2025 Between: 1. SATTIRAJU NARASIMHAM, S/O VENKATA RATNAM, AGE 62 YEARS, OCC RETD. ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER OF SBI, R/O PLOT NO.404, FLAT NO.102, ROAD NO.2/2, SREE RAVI NILAYAM, MATRUSRI NAGAR, HAFEEZPET, MIYAPUR, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE. 2. PRATHIBHA MAURYA,, D/O PREM NARAYANA MAURYA, AGE 46 YEARS, OCC SBI BRANCH MANAGER, R/O G/1410, FAIZABAD ROAD, NIKAT SHIV MANDIR, PAISAR, NAWABGANJ, BARABANKI DISTRICT, UTTAR PRADESH STATE. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522238 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE DGP, CRIME INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT (CID), MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.522503 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CID PS, A.P., MEDICAL COLLEGE BACKSIDE, KANNAVARITHOTA, GUNTUR DISTRICT522034. ...RESPONDENT(S): 8 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 in not considering the representations of the petitioners dt 26.09.2025 submitted in connection with the F.I.R.No.67/2022, dt 08.12.2022 registered under Sec.420, 406, 409, 467, 471, r/w 120-B IPC and Sec.13 (2) of PC Act, 1988 as illegal, arbitrary and consequentially direct the respondents 2 and 3 to consider and dispose of the petitioners representation dt 26.09.2025, in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to consider the representations of the petitioners dt 26.09.2025 submitted in connection with the F.I.R.No.67/2022, dt 08.12.2022, pending disposal of the main writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. AISHWARYA NAGULA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. AISHWARYA NAGULA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 9 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION Nos: 35576, 35591, 35593 and 35614 of 2025 COMMON ORDER: The parties and the relief sought by them is one and the same, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of these writ petitions by way of this Common Order. 2. Heard Ms.Aishwarya Nagula, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home and Sri S.Syam Sundar Rao, learned Special Public Prosecutor for CID. 3. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the investigation in these matters is endorsed to the CID. 4. Sri S.Syam Sundar Rao, learned Special Public Prosecutor for CID would submit that the petitioners have submitted representations to the investigating officer in these matters. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that it would suffice to give direction to the investigating officer to look into representations of the petitioners, during the course of investigation and take appropriate decision. 6. Learned Special Public Prosecutor for CID would submit that the investigating officer cannot pass any orders on such representations but the court may pass appropriate orders. 10 7. Considering the submissions made, these writ petitions are disposed of. However, the investigating officer-respondent No.3 is directed to look into the grievance of the petitioners during the course of investigation and take appropriate decision over the matter and conclude the investigation according to the law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, all miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 22.12.2025 KKV