2025:JHHC:19920 --1-- C.M.P. No. 597 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI C.M.P. No. 597 of 2025 ---- Manish Kumar Mandal, aged about 33 years, son of Shri Lal Mandal, present resident of Road No.4, Qr. No. K2/14, Telco, PO and PS – Telco, Jamshedpur, and permanent resident of Janta Flat No.8/7, Chhotagovindpur, PO – Chhotagovindpur, PS – Govindpur, Town – Jamshedpur, District – East Singhbhum .... Petitioner -- Versus -- Neha Mandal, daughter of Umesh Singh, wife of Manish Kumar Mandal, resident of Cross Road No.4, Qr. No. K/14, Telco, PO and PS – Telco, Jamshedpur, District – East Singhbhum, Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Jitendra Nath Upadhyay, Advocate For the O.P :- ---- 04/21.07.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 2. This petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside of the order dated 09.12.2024 passed in Original Suit No.850 of 2023 by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Jamshedpur whereby the petition dated 02.08.2024 filed under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act by the respondent – wife was allowed and the petitioner has been directed to pay Rs.4,000/- per month as interim maintenance from the date of filing of the petition and the petitioner was further directed to pay Rs.1,000/- to the respondent – wife on each date if she appear physically and Rs.500/- if her appearance is through Advocate. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the 2025:JHHC:19920 --2-- C.M.P. No. 597 of 2025 said petition has been erroneously decided by the learned Court and the learned Court has not examined the income of the petitioner in its right perspective. He submits in view of that the said interim maintenance may kindly be modified. 4. Considering that the petitioner is the husband of respondent herein and very meagre amount of Rs.4,000/- has been allowed for maintenance, Rs.1,000/- on the date of physical appearance and Rs.500/- if her appearance is made through Advocate before the learned Court. The petitioner is the husband and he has the obligation to maintain the wife and only a very meagre amount is allowed. No case of interference is made out, as such this petition is dismissed. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Sangam/