Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53884 (CHH)

MUSTAFA RAZA v. AMREEN NAAZ

REVP/334/2025 · 2025-10-16

Shri Sachin Singh Rajput, Smt Rajani Dubey

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:51960-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No. 334 of 2025 1 - Mustafa Raza S/o. Maulana Yahya (Father), Aged About 32 Years R/o Housing Board Kailash Nagar, Near Maszid, Police Station Jamul Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Amreen Naaz W/o Mustfa Raza, Aged About 30 Years Presently R/o M.I.G.- 1- 19/6 Jawahar Nagar Near K.H. Memorial School, Bhilai, Police Station Jamul, Tahsil And District Durg (C.G.).....(Applicant) 2 - Maulana Yahya, Aged About 55 Years R/o Housing Board Kailash Nagar, Near Maszid, Police Station Jamul Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg (C.G.) 3 - Ambari Khatoon, W/o Maulana Yahya, Aged About 50 Years (Mother) R/o Housing Board Kailash Nagar, Near Maszid, Police Station Jamul Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg (C.G.) 4 - Mushhid Raza, S/o Maulana Yahay, Aged About 30 Years (Brother) R/o Housing Board Kailash Nagar, Near Maszid, Police Station Jamul Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Shri G.M.Hasan, Advocate 2 DB: Hon’ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput}) Order on Board 17/10/2025 The defaults pointed out by the Registry is ignored. This petition is for review of judgment and decree dated 24/04/2024 passed in FA(MAT) No.192/2024. Upon perusal of the grounds of review, it appears that the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks re-hearing of the appeal. There is no apparent error of law requiring review. The review petition is misconceived in law and is therefore, dismissed. Sd/- Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) (Sachin Singh Rajput) JUDGE JUDGE Deepti DEEPTI HARIKUMAR Digitally signed by DEEPTI HARIKUMAR Date: 2025.10.17 17:58:29 +0530