1 2025:CGHC:57302 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3950 of 2025 1. Salik Ram Verma S/o Late Shri Sukhiram Verma Aged About 62 Years R/o Ward No. 32, Behind Madina Masjid, Anand Nagar Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Pardeshi Ram Satnami S/o Late Bisouha Ram Satnami Aged About 70 Years R/o Village Katiya, Post Office- Katiya, Police Station- Nawapara, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Smt. Bishni Bai Sahu W/o Late Mangal Ram Sahu Aged About 61 Years R/o Ward No. 17, Irrigation Colony, Bakhtara, Abhanpur, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4. Ishwari Ram Sahu S/o Late Shri Banau Ram Sahu Aged About 62 Years R/o Village Dunda, Post Office- Sejbahar, Tahsil And, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5. Smt. Champa Bai Sahu W/o Late Shri Bodhan Lal Sahu Aged About 69 Years R/o Village- Central Post Office Kendri, Tahsil, Abhanpur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 6. Smt. Dayawati Khura W/o Shri Prabhu Khura Aged About 66 Years R/o Jal Vihar Colony, Utkal Basti, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 7. Smt. Maina Bai Verma W/o Late Shri Sadhu Ram Verma Aged About 59 Years R/o Village- Bhurkoni, Post Office- Mandhar, Tahsil And, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Water Resources Department Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. The Executive Engineer Water Resources Department Raipur Division- 1, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh MANISH YADAV Digitally signed by MANISH YADAV Date: 2025.11.26 11:45:05 +0530 2 3. The Joint Director Treasury Accounts And Pension Raipur Division, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Khushbu Sahu, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Aditya Tiwari, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 25.11.2025 1. The issue involved in this writ petition has already been decided by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & Others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh [WPS No. 3870 of 2021 (decided on 30.09.2022]. 2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition also deserves to be disposed of in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel (supra). 3. Accordingly, the writ petition (s) stands disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Manish