APHC010379392021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23211/2021 Between: 1. MEDA CHANDRASEKHAR, S/O SUBRAMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCCUPATION. BUSINESS, R/O D.NO 13-2-682, SRINIVASA NAGAR, ANANTHAPURAM, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAM, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, A.P. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE RURAL, ANANTHAPURAM, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, A.P. 4. VELURU RAMANJANEYULU, S/O KONDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/ O D.NO 9-122, OGETIVARI STREET, TADIPATRI TOWN, ANANTHAPURAM, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, A.P. 5. DHARMAVARAPU MURALI, S/O DHARMAVARAPU KONDANNA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. CONTRACTOR, R/O 5-57, OC COLONY, VENKATAPURAM, NASANAKOTA, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order, or direction more particularly in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring - the action of 2nd and 3rd respondents in not registering a crime on a complaint made by the petitioner dated 12-07-2021 against the 4th and 5th respondents is arbitrary, illegal and to issue a consequential direction to the 2nd and 3rd respondent to register a crime against the respondents 4 and 5 basing on the complaint dated 12-07-2021 submitted by the petitioner and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A RAJENDRA BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief: “ ... to issue a writ, order, or direction more particularly in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring - the action of 2nd and 3rd respondents in not registering a crime on a complaint made by the petitioner dated 12-07-2021 against the 4th and 5th respondents is arbitrary, illegal and to issue a consequential direction to the 2nd and 3rd respondent to register a crime against the respondents 4 and 5 basing on the complaint dated 12-07-2021 submitted by the petitioner and to pass ...” Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on instructions would submit that the contents of the complaints reveal that the subject matter is purely civil in nature and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Petitioner is at liberty to approach the competent Civil Court for redressal of the grievance according to law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* Dinesh