T.M.C.-HI-TECH v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER STATE GST, COOCH BEHAR CHARGE AND ORS
WPA/2733/2022 · 2025-03-06
Jay Sengupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53867 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53867 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2 06.3.2025
Ct. No. 2 SB
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI
W.P.A. 2733 of 2022
T.M.C. -HI - TECH Vs. Asstt. Commissioner State GST. Cooch Behar Charge & Ors.
Mr. Soumava Gangopadhyay … for the petitioner
Mr. Subir Kumar Saha … for the State
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that certain additional facts have to be incorporated in the writ petition. Accordingly, his client would not like to press this application with liberty to file afresh.
On the prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
However, this shall not preclude the petitioner from filing a proper application afresh on the self same grounds.
Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon completion of requisite formalities.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)