IN THE HIGH 128+129+130 CWP-12799 Jasbeer Singh CWP-12802 Rahul Mahajan CWP-12804 Parvinder Kumar CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. disposed of together. 2. dated 19.02.2025 and directing the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners against the post of Agriculture Sub Inspector (Soil). 3. dated 05.09.2024 rendered in similar case being CWP Harwinder Singh wherein the respondents have been directed to consider the candidates as per their merit against the posts that IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH +129+130 12799-2025 Jasbeer Singh vs. State of Punjab 12802-2025 Rahul Mahajan vs. State of Punjab 12804-2025 Parvinder Kumar and others vs. State CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab Mr. Amarpeet Singh Bains, AAG, Punjab. CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) These cases involve similar issues and therefore, are being disposed of together. Prayer made in the present petitions is for quashing the order dated 19.02.2025 and directing the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners against the post of Agriculture Sub Inspector (Soil). Learned counsel for the petitioner dated 05.09.2024 rendered in similar case being CWP Harwinder Singh vs. State of Punjab and others wherein the respondents have been directed to consider the candidates as per their merit against the posts that lying vacant, however, while passing COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 06.05.2025 f Punjab and Others f Punjab and Others State of Punjab and Others BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Advocate, Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab and Mr. Amarpeet Singh Bains, AAG, Punjab. These cases involve similar issues and therefore, are being Prayer made in the present petitions is for quashing the order dated 19.02.2025 and directing the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners against the post of Agriculture Sub Inspector (Soil). Learned counsel for the petitioners relies on the decision dated 05.09.2024 rendered in similar case being CWP-758-2017, State of Punjab and others, and connected case, wherein the respondents have been directed to consider the candidates as lying vacant, however, while passing PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.05.06 16:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-12799-2025 and connected cases -2- the order impugned herein, the aforesaid direction has not been taken into account. 4. The aforesaid facts having been brought out, during the course of hearing, learned State counsel, on instructions, states that the respondents would not be averse to have a relook at the matter and decide afresh, taking note of the aforesaid judgment, within a period of 6 months, uninfluenced by the order impugned in the present case, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. 5. The aforesaid satisfies the learned counsel for the petitioners. 6. The matter stands disposed of accordingly and if the petitioners are found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to their interest, the same may be passed after granting opportunity of hearing to them and shall contain reasons, whereupon they shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. 7. Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected files. 06.05.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.05.06 16:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.