Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010002432024
2025:GAU-AS:5566
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : CRP/77/2024 P LAXMI W/O LATE P BAIKUNTHA RAO, RESIDENT OF TIPONG COLLIERY, PO TIPONG, PS MARGHERITA, DIST TINSUKIA, ASSAM 786125 VERSUS SMTI P LAXMI ALIAS RAMANAMMA RESIDENT OF PO AND VILLAGE CHATTRAPETA, DIST SRIKULAM (ANDHRA PRADESH) 532001 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR D KALITA, Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER 05.05.2025 Heard Mr D Kalita, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
2. This is an application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, “the CPC”), challenging the order dated 09.11.2023, whereby the suit of the petitioner, who is the plaintiff, being Title Suit No. 7/2015, was dismissed by the Court
Page No.# 2/2 of the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) No. 1, Tinsukia. The ground on which the suit was dismissed is that the plaintiff has not adduced any evidence.
3. This Court duly takes note that the pleadings are not proof and nothing could be shown that the defendants had admitted the case of the plaintiff.
4. Considering the above, this Court finds no error in exercise of jurisdiction by the learned Court of the Civil Judge (Junior Division) No. 1, Tinsukia, in its order dated 09.11.2023, for which the instant petition stands dismissed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant