Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53845 (AP)

SRINIVASA ENGINEERING WORKS v. M/S. RASHTYIRYA ISPAT NIGAM LTD AND 2 OTHERS

WP/4408/2016 · 2025-10-12

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010638412016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 4408/2016 Between: 1. SRINIVASA ENGINEERING WORKS, D.NO. LIG-377, VUDA COLONY, VINAYAKANAGAR, PO-PEDAGANTYADA, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 044, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI GV SURYANARAYANA, S/ O LATE VENKATA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. . ...PETITIONER AND 1. M/S RASHTYIRYA ISPAT NIGAM LTD, VISAKHAPATNAM STEEL PLANT, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 031, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. THE DY GENERAL MANAGER WORKS CONTRACTS, M/S RASHTRIYA ISPAT NIGAM LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM STEEL PLANT, VSP-530 031. 3. THE ASST GENERAL MANAGER WORKS CONTRACTS, SECTION M/S RASHTRIYA ISPAT NIGAM LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM STEEL PLANT, VSP-530 031. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in disqualifying my eligibility and not opening petitioner's Tender with regard to Tender No.754320 dated 28-09-2015 with regard to work for Instrumentation Of Maintenance in SMS-2 without any notice as arbitrary, illegal and against the principals of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to open 2 JS,J W.P.No.4408/2016 petitioner's Envelop-2 of Tender No.75432-0 dated 28-9-2015 by qualifying petitioner's eligibility in the Tender with regard to participate in future Tenders with regard to same work and pass such other order or orders as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 5643 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to open petitioner's Envelop-2 with regard to Tender No.75432-0 dated 28-09-2015 with regard to work for Instrumentation Of Maintenance in SMS-2 immediately or not to award the subject contract to anybody pending disposal of the WP and pass such other order or orders as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Y VIVEKANANDA SWAMY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VIVEK CHANDRA SEKHAR S 2. V RAVINDER RAO 3 JS,J W.P.No.4408/2016 The Court made the following ORDER: No representation for the petitioner. As there was no representation for the petitioner on 06.10.2025, the matter is directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Today when the matter is called there is no representation for the petitioner. Perused the record. Since the matter relates to opening the tenders for the year 2015, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 13.10.2025 KAS 4 JS,J W.P.No.4408/2016 118 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 4408/2016 Dated: 13.10.2025 KAS