Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53843 (KAR)

SMT DILSHADBEGUM W/O SADDAM HUSSAIN NADAF v. SRI HUCHCHSAB S/O YAMANOORSAB NADAF ALIAS PINJAR

CRL.P/102745/2022 · 2025-11-18

S Rachaiah

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15798 CRL.P No. 102745 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RACHAIAH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.102745 OF 2022 (482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. DILSHADBEGUM W/O. SADDAM HUSAIN NADAF, AGE. 31 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE HOLD WORK, R/O. ABBIGERI, TQ. RON NOW AT KHANTOT, JANATA COLONY, GADAG, DIST. GADAG-582101. 2. KUMAR. MAHAMADYUNISH S/O. SADDAM HUSAIN NADAF, AGE. 4 YEARS, OCC. NIL, REPRESENTED BY HER NATURAL MOTHER PETITIONER NO.1 SMT. DILSHADBEGUM W/O. SADDAM HUSAIN NADAF, R/O. ABBIGERI, TQ. RON, NOW AT KHANTOT JANATA COLONY, GADAG, DIST. GADAG-582101. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. M.C. HUKKERI, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SAMREEN AYUB DESHNUR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15798 CRL.P No. 102745 of 2022 AND: 1. SRI. HUCHCHSAB S/O. YAMANOORSAB NADAF @ PINJAR, AGE. 62 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS AND AGRICULTURE, R/O. WARD NO.6, HARLAPUR GALLI ABBIGERI, TQ. RON, DIST. GADAG-582101. 2. SMT. JINNATABI W/O. HUCHCHSAB NADAF @ PINJAR, AGE. 52 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE HOLD WORK, R/O. WARD NO.6 HARLAPUR GALLI ABBIGERI, TQ. RON, DIST. GADAG-582101. …RESPONDENTS THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO, QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED IN CRIL.MISC.NO.106/2020 FILED UNDER SECTION 125 OF CR.P.C., BY THE COURT OF THE I ADDL. PRL. JUDGE FAMILY COURT, GADAG DATED 09.12.2021, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15798 CRL.P No. 102745 of 2022 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RACHAIAH) Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the petition, in terms of the memo dated 18.11.2025, with liberty to approach the Trial Court by filing necessary application under Domestic Violence Act. Memo is placed on record. Considering the said memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (S.RACHAIAH) JUDGE SMM/CT: UMD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3