1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Cr. Revision Nos. 42 and 62 of 2013 Decided on : 3.4.2025 Cr. Revision No. 42 of 2013 Sushil Kumar Acharya & anr. …Petitioners Versus Krishna Devi …Respondents Cr. Revision No. 62 of 2013 Sushil Kumar Acharya & anr. ...Petitioners Versus Krishna Devi ...Respondents ___________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge Whether approved for reporting? ________________________________________________ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun, Advocate vice Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondent : None. 2 Virender Singh, Judge (oral) Learned vice counsel for the petitioner(s), under instructions, submits that respondent Krishna Devi has expired. As such, the present petitions are rendered infructous, and the same are disposed of, as infructuous. The pending application(s), if any, are also disposed of. (Virender Singh) Judge April 3, 2025 (Kalpana)