Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:72331 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6071 of 2025 Petitioner :- Samasu And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Saurabh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Harshit Pandey Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. The petitioners have been working as Safai Karmachari in the respondent Nagar Palika Parishad. The petitioners claim that they are entitled for regularization of their services. A representation in this regard has been made but to no avail. The only prayer made by Shri Saurabh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners is that the representation of the petitioners may be decided within a stipulated period of time. Shri Harshit Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 3 and 4 submits the matter requires factual determination as per applicable law by the competent authority in the first instance. The claims of the petitioners need to be ascertained whether he was appointed by the corporation on its rolls, or was a contractual employee engaged by the contractor. However, he fairly contends that the claim of the petitioners for regularization is liable to be decided within a reasonable time frame. In wake of the preceding discussion and without going into the merits of the case, the respondent no. 4 is directed to decide the representation of the petitioners regarding regularization of their services within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with a fresh copy of the representation. It is clarified that this Court has not gone into the veracity of the assertions made in the writ petition nor has judged the claim of the petitioners on merit. It is for the competent authority to do so after independent application of mind and in accordance with law. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 6.5.2025 Dhananjai Digitally signed by :- DHANANJAI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad