APHC010547852018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] THURSDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1927/2018 Between: 1. K. SOLOMAN, S/O. LATE APPANNA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE, R/O. FLAT NO. 204, ASPEN TOWERS, OLD RESAPUVANIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. K. VIJAY KUMAR, S/O. SIMHACHALAM, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS OCC, BUSINESS, R/O. 16-53-3, AVN COLLEGE ROAD, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SRI D B D B KUMAR, REGIOTASGTY DIRECTOR, ( F.A.C) SURVEY SETTLEMENT AND LAND RECORDS, MULTIZONE- I KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. SRI TRIPATI, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR DISTRICT SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS COLLECTORATE, VISAKHAPATNAM VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. T RAJYALAXMI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. NJS,J C.C No.1927 of 2018 2 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioners is not available. Ms. K Vijayeswari, learned Assistant Government Pleader represented the learned counsel for the respondent No.2. 2. The present contempt case is filed alleging non-compliance of the order dated 12.09.2017 in W.P No.26059 of 2017. 3. While disposing of the said writ petition, the learned Judge of erstwhile Common High Court for the State of Telangana and State of Andhra Pradesh, directed the respondent No.3/The Regional Deputy Director, Survey, Settlement and Land Records, Kakinada, East Godavari District, to examine the records of Assistant Director/District Survey and Land Records with reference to the service of notice in advance to the writ petitioners about conducting of the survey and take appropriate decision as warranted by law as to conducting of survey in the presence of the writ petitioners, in the event, if conclusion is arrived to the fact that there was no notice to the petitioners before conducting survey by the respondent No.4. 4. On 26.09.2018, the respondent No.2 filed a counter-affidavit duly setting out the relevant aspects with regard to the issuance of notice dated 03.03.2018 to the petitioners and others about conducting of survey in respect of the subject matter land and issuance of endorsement dated 16.07.2018 by way of registered post etc. No reply-affidavit is filed denying the said aspects including the averment that the orders dated 12.09.2017 were complied with. 5. In the aforementioned circumstances, this Contempt Case is closed. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:06.11.2025 Ksj