Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53831 (BOM)

NAVJIVAN SHIKSHAN SANSTHA, NAGPUR THR. PRESIDENT, DR. VISHNUPANT BHAURAO KIMMATKAR AND ANR. v. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, NAGPUR DIVISION, NAGPUR AND ORS.

WP/3321/2023 · 2025-05-09

Shri Anil L Pansare

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

17.wp.3321.23 1/1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.3321 of 2023 Navjivan Shikshan Sanstha , Shitalwadi, Ramtek and another vs. Deputy Director of Education, Nagpur Division and others =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= None for the Petitioners. Ms. K.P. Marpakwar, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. S.D. Chande, Advocate for Respondent No.3. CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE, J. DATE : 9 th MAY , 2025. None appeared for the petitioners on previous date and today as well. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. 02. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed as not prosecuted. 03. Copy of the order be served upon the petitioners for taking appropriate steps, if so desired. (Anil L. Pansare, J.) *sandesh 2025:BHC-NAG:5036