1 APHC010564102025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] FRIDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 29339/2025 Between: 1. SRI SUBRAHMANYESWARA CONSTRUCTIONS, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, K. MUTYALA RAO, S/O. K. MANIKYAM, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, D.NO.1-85, KANDULAPATIVARI MERAKA, KUMMARA PURUGU PALEM VILLAGE, MOGALTHUR MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, TRANSPORT, ROADS AND BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE ENGINEERINCHIEF, ROADS AND BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT HOD BUILDINGS, M.G.ROAD, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH - 520010 3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, R AND B CIRCLE, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRIC 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R AND B DIVISION, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 5. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, SUB-DIVISION NO.1, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 6. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, SUB-DIVISION-1, ROADS AND BUILDINGS BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 7. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, A.P 2 SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CHERUVU CHAITANYA BHARGAVA SARMA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri Cheruvu Chaitanya Bhargava Sarma, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, Sri Shaik Abdul Rasheed, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Roads & Buildings and Sri P. Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance & Planning. 2. Sri Shaik Abdul Rasheed, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Roads & Buildings, has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Executive Engineer (R&B), Bhimavaram dated 19.12.2025. Copy of it is supplied to the Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and the same is taken on record. 3. The Written Instructions would indicate that the payments have already been made in favour of the Writ Petitioner. 4. Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner confirms this position that the due amount has been received. Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner seeks liberty to claim interest for the delayed payment. 5. Needless to state that the Writ Petitioner may approach the appropriate Forum in accordance with law. 6. With these observations, this Writ Petition stands allowed. No order as to costs. 3 7. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. _________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 19.12.2025 Vns