APHC010437082024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23074 OF 2024 Between: 1. SHAIK BAJI, S/o. SilarSaheb, age 53 years, R/o. Near Bank Colony, Prakash Nagar, Narasaraopet, Palnadu District ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, Rep. by its Secretary, Home Dept., Secretariat, Amaravati, A.P. 2. The Superintendent of PoliceUrban, Palnadu District, Narasaraopet 3. The Station House Officer, 1 Town P.S., Narasaraopet, Palnadu District 4. T LalithaKumari, W/o. Ravikumar, age 50 years, R/o Opp Malabar Hotel, Narasaraopet, Palnadu District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent and his subordinates in interfering with the petitioners life, liberty without following due process of law against the petitioners schedule property as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with petitioners life, liberty without following due process of law against the petitioner's schedule property pending Disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: THOTA RAMAKOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23074 OF 2024 The Court made the following order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent and his subordinates in interfering with the petitioners life, liberty without following due process of law against the petitioners schedule property as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and…” 2. No representation for the petitioner. 3. Sri P.Ajay Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that respondent police are not interfering in the life and liberty of the petitioner. 4. Recording the same, the writ petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioner except in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:20.12.2025 KKV