Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53820 (ALL)

SANTOSH KUMAR PANKAJ v. RAJENDRA PRASAD AND 4 OTHERS

A227/4968/2025 · 2025-05-14

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:80732 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4968 of 2025 Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Pankaj Respondent :- Rajendra Prasad And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Wahaj Ahmad Siddiqui Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. This is plaintiff's petition. In the suit instituted by the petitioner, an application for grant of temporary injunction was moved, which was allowed by the trial Court. According to petitioner's counsel, injunction order has been violated by the defendants which have led to filing of application under Order XXXIX, Rule 2-A C.P.C., which has been registered as Misc. Case No.14 of 2017. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the same. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon Civil Judge (Junior Division), Chandauli to decide Misc. Case No.14 of 2017 (Jokahn Ram vs. Munni & Ors. under Order XXXIX, Rule 2-A C.P.C., in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit. Sri Vinod Kumar, Advocate, is present for respondent No.2. Order Date :- 15.5.2025 Kushal Digitally signed by :- KUSHAL AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad