Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53817 (AP)

K RAMAM v. PRL.SECRERARY ( INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE) AND 3 OTHERS

WP/17500/2017 · 2025-12-30

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010507082017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] SATURDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 17500/2017 Between: 1. K RAMAM, S/O. APPALA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O. QTR NO.71, ETIKOPPAKA. SUGAR FACTORY QTRS, DARIAPUDI, S. RAYAVARARN MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAIN - 531082. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PRL SECRERARY INDUSTRIES COMMERCE AND 3 OTHERS, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF SUGAR CANE COMMISSIONER, GOVT. OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. 3. THE COMMISSIONER FOR COOPERATION REGISTRAR, OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, GOVT. OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. 4. THE ETIKOPPAKA SUGAR FACTORY, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, ETIKOPPAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Orders, Direction or Directions to direct the respondents to act in accordance with law and to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in service as Chief Agriculture Officer in the 4th respondent organization in pursuance to the Resolution of its Board of Directors dated 12,05.2017, and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VEDULA SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) 2. GP FOR INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 17500/2017 Order: When the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms. Priyandvita Poppuri, learned counsel representing Sri Vedula Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that in view of subsequent events taken place in the lis, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication. 2. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Date:31.12.2025 ARB/JAK 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM 110 WRIT PETITION NO:17500 of 2017 Date:31.12.2025 ARB/JAK