Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53815 (AP)

M/s. V.S.S. Constiuctions, v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/26156/2025 · 2025-11-03

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010490412025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 26156/2025 Between: 1. M/S. V.S.S. CONSTIUCTIONS,, REP, BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, S. VEERA SHEKAR REDDY, S/O CHINNA VEERA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC CONTRAETOR, 1ST FLOOR, DCMS COMPLEX, NAGARAJIIPETA, KADAPA CITY, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLAMIMG, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, A.P.E.W.I.D.C, VADDESWARAM, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, A.P.E.W.I.D.C., KADAPA CITY AND DISTRICT. 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, A.P.E.W.I.D.C., TIRUPATI CITY AND DISTRICT 2 6. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, A.P.E.W.I.D.C., CHITTOOR CITY AND DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SHAIK AFZAL MOHAMMED Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri A. Balakrishna, learned Counsel representing Sri Shaik Afzal Mohammed, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, Sri Radhakrishna, Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri V. Ch. Naidu, Learned Standing Counsel for APEWIDC and Sri P. Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance & Planning. 2. Sri Radhakrishna, Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri V. Ch. Naidu, Learned Standing Counsel for APEWIDC, has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Executive Engineer, APEWIDC. Tirupati, dated 03.11.2025. Copy of it is supplied to the Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and the same is taken on record. 3. Serial No.15 of the Written Instructions would indicate that the bills have been accepted and uploaded in the CFMS Portal. 4. In this view of the matter, this Court deems it appropriate to allow the present Writ Petition with a direction to Respondent No.1 and others to complete the entire administrative process, both inter-departmental and intra- departmental, by way of mutual cooperation and coordination within a period of twelve (12) weeks from today and transfer the amount due to the bank account of the Writ Petitioner within four (04) weeks thereafter. 3 5. Writ Petitioner is directed to furnish his bank account details to the Competent Authority within four (04) weeks for effective compliance. 6. With these observations and directions, the Writ Petition stands allowed. No order as to costs. 7. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. _________________________________ GANNAMANENIRAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 04.11.2025 DSV 4 162 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 26156/2025 04.11.2025 DSV 5 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No. WRIT PETITION NO: 26156/2025 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No DATE ORDER Office Note 2. 04.11.2025 GRKP, J Writ Petition is allowed. (vide separate order) ___________ GRKP, J DSV 6