IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 31435 OF 2024 Between: V. Siva Sunil Kumar Reddy, S/o. Haranatha Reddy, aged years, Occ Business, R/o. D.No.16/111/1521, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District Krishna Avenue, Harnathpuram, ...PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Department of Finance and Planning, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh; "Represented by its Special Chief Secretary, Department of Irrigation and Water Resources Secretariat. Velagapudi, Guntur District. 3. The Commissioner, CADA and Secretary to Government, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 4. The Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Circle, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District. 5. The Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, Nellore Central Division, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District. 6. The Pay and Accounts Officer, Works and Accounts, D.No.29-2-52, Manasa Complex, Rama Mandiram Street, Governorpet, Vijayawada, Krishna District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order, writ or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not releasing the final bills amount of Rs. 26,96,833/- and Rs. 24,13,404/- totaling Rs. 51,10,237/- to the petitioner along with interest for the work executed in pursuance of the agreements entered into with the Respondent vide Agreements No. 28 0&M/DN/2020-21 and 31 0&M/DN/2020-21 dated 25.06.2020 as illegal, arbitrary, violation of principles of natural justice unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to release undisputed final bill amount Rs. 26,96,833/- and Rs. 24,13,404/- totaling Rs. 51,10,237/- to the petitioner along with interest forthwith. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cou pleased to direct the respondents to release undisputed final bill amount of Rs. 26,96,833/- and Rs. 24,13,404/- to tailing Rs. 51,10,237/- to the petitioner along with interest for fhe work executed in pursuance of the agreements entered into with the '5“^ respondent vide Agreements No. 28 0&M/DN/2020-21 and 31 0&M/DN/2020-21 dated 25.06.2020, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner; SRI RAMESH BABU TALLURI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 6: GP FOR FINANCE & PLANNING Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 5: GP FOR IRRIGATION AND CAD The Court made the following: ORDER rt may be F APHC010602392024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 0MB [3459] THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT the honourable smt justice SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 31435/2024 Between: V Siva Sunil Kumar Reddy ...PETITIONER AND \ The State Of Ap and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.RAMESH BABU TALLURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following ORDER: The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: ...RESPONDENT(S) “...to issue order, writ or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents In not releasing the final bills amount of Rs. 26,96,833/- and Rs. 24,13,404/- totaling Rs. 51,10,237/- to the petitioner along with Interest for the work executed in pursuance of the agreements entered into with the respondent vide Agreements No. 28 O AND M/DN/2020-21 and 31 O AND M/DN/2020-21 dated 25.06.2020 as illegal, arbitrary, violation of principles of natural justice consequently direct the respondents to release undisputed final bill amount Rs. 26,96,833/- and Rs. 24,13,404/- totaling Rs. 51,10,237/- to the petitioner unconstitutional and along with interest forthwith and to fit and proper in the circumstances of the Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that already released to the petitioner, the survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become pass such other order or orders may deem case. 2. as the bill amount is cause in the writ petition does not infructuous. 3. Recording the above submission infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs the Writ Petition is dismissed as As a sequel, miscellaneous pending petitions if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- M. SRINIVAS ISTRAR ASSISTANT R //TRUE COPY// SECTJON OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri Ramesh Babu Talluri, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two GO’S to GP for Finance and Planning, High Court of A.P. at Amaravati[OUT] 3. Two CCs to GP for Irrigation and CAD, High Court of A.P. at Amaravati[OUT] 4. Three CD Copies. ssb HIGH COURT DATED:01/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.31435 of 2024 3 2 9 SEP 2025 K. Co O' SsCurrent SectijuxC^ Sw costI"'-'’-“ '«'^™‘=TUOUS