JAHANGIR ALAM@BAW v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR
CRM(M)/248/2025 · 2025-09-11
Dinesh Kumar Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53808 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53808 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
11.09.2025 SL No.41 Ct. No.03 Sudipta
Calcutta High Court In The Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri
CRM (M) 248 of 2025
In Re: An application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
And
In Re : Jahangir Alam @ Baw ……Petitioner
For the petitioner : Mr. Sourav Ganguly Mr. Bibek Tarafdar Ms. Rishita Chakraborty Mr. Gopal Roy …..Advocate For the State : Mr. Ujjwal Luksom Mr. Biswarup Roy …..Advocates For the de facto complainant : Ms. Sidhi Sethia …..Advocate
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the victim has yet not been examined wherein the charges were framed on 13.11.2024.
2. Learned Trial Court is directed to complete the examination of the victim within the period of two months positively.
2
3. Learned counsel for the de facto complainant is
directed to ensure that the victim appears in the Court on being summoned for evidence.
4. In the circumstances,
learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.
5. Hence, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
6. Upon request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the matter be placed before the next available Circuit Bench. ( Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. )