APHC010652272025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 33869 OF 2025 Between: 1. DOKALA RAMAYAMMA, D/o.Late Somayya, Aged 43 Years, R/o.Door No.2-5-108/1, Kondapeta, Tagarapuvalasa, Bhimunipatnam Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 2. Akula Venkata Ratnam @ Lahari,, D/o.Late Dokala Somaiah, W/o.A.Srinivas, Age 39 years, R/o.Door No.12-11-382, 2nd Floor, Warasiguda, Near Pochamma Temple Secunderabad, Telangana state ...Petitioners AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, Represented by its Principal Secretary. Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati 2. The District Collector, Vizianagaram. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Vizianagaram. 4. The Tahasildar, Denkada Mandal, Vizianagarm District. 5. The Special Deputy Collector, KRCC, Vizianagaram. ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: G SAI NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE 2 W.P.No.33869 of 2025 The Court made the following ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “...to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent authorities in not granting the petitioners compensation for their assigned agricultural land in an extent of Ac.0.46 cents in survey No.39-18 of Ragumanda Village Denkada Mandal, Vizianagaram District which was acquired for the purpose of implementing Jagananna Pedalandariki lllu scheme as arbitrary, illegal, high handed and violative of principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14,21,and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent authorities to pay the petitioners their rightful compensation and to pass...” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 3. While arguing the matter, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that he brought all the material through representation dated 03.11.2025 to the respondents No.2 and 4 and requested to conduct an enquiry with regard to the representation and take appropriate decision. 4. Considering the said submissions, this Court is not inclined to go into the merits of the case. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents No.2 and 4 to consider the representation of the petitioners and based on records, take appropriate steps. The same may be communicated to the petitioner. The said exercise should be completed within 3 W.P.No.33869 of 2025 a period of two (2) months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. No order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE D. RAMESH Date: 22.12.2025 NSM 4 W.P.No.33869 of 2025 49 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 33869 OF 2025 22.12.2025 NNSSM M