Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53802 (AP)

P SURYANANARAYANA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/31577/2025 · 2025-11-17

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010604752025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 31577/2025 Between: P SURYANANARAYANA, S/O ANJINAIAH, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, OCCU- CULTIVATION, R/O 1-82, B.C. COLONY, CHIRTHANAKALLU VILLAGE KOSIGI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPO BY ITS PRINCIPAL, SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPER INDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF KOSIGI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT 4. SRI HANUMANTHA REDDY, STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KOSIGI POLICE STATION, KOSIGI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. JANGAM PEDDA HANUMAPPA, S/O NARSI REDDY, AGE 45 YEARS R/O CHIRTHANAKALLLU VILLAGE, KOSIGI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT 6. JANGAM CHINNA HANUMAPPA, S/O NARSI REDDY, AGED 44 YEARS, R/O CHIRTHANAKALLLU VILLAGE, KOSIGI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 7. JANGAM VENKATESH, S/O NARSI REDDY, AGED 34 YEARS R/O CHIRTHANAKAILLU VILLAGE, KOSIGI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 8. JANGAM HANUMANTHA REDDY, S/O LAKSHUMANNA AGED 45 YEARS R/O CHIRTHANAKAILLU VILLAGE, KOSIGI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 9. JANGAM LAKHUMANNA, S/O NOT KNOWN. AGED 62 YEARS R/O CHIRTHANAKAILLU VILLAGE, KOSIGI MANDAL,KURNOOL DISTRICT. 10. JANGAM HANUMESH, S/O JANGAM RUDRAIAH, AGED 30 YEARS R/O CHIRTHANAKAILLU VILLAGE, KOSIGI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 11. JANGAM MALILIKARJUNA, S/O PEDDA GIDDAIAH., AGED 30 2 YEARS R/O CHIRTHANAKAILLU VILLAGE, KOSIGI MANDAL,KURNOOL DISTRICT. 12. JANGAM SEETHA RAMI REDDY, S/O PEDDA GIDDIAH, AGED 35 YEARS R/O CHIRTHANAKAILLU VILLAGE, KOSIGI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT 13. JANGAM CHINNA HANUMAPPA, S/O JANGAM CHINNA GIDDAIAH AGE 27 YEARS, /O CHIRTHANAKAILLU VILLAGE, KOSIGI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 14. JAGAMVENKATESH, S/O NARSI REDDY, R/O CHIRTHANAKAILLU VILLAGE, KOSIGI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 15. JANGAM GOVINDU, S/O NARSI REDDY. AGED 42 YEARS, R/O CHIRTHANAKAILLU VILLAGE, KOSIGI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 16. JANGAM SURESH, S/O JANAGAM LLAKHUMANNA. AGED 28 YEARS R/O CHIRTHANAKAILLU VILLAGE, KOSIGI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 17. JANGAM CHITTI, S/O VERANNA, AGED 40 YEARS R/O CHIRTHANAKAILLU VILLAGE, KOSIGI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 18. JANGAM VEDUKONDALU, S/O NARSI REDDY, AGED 40 YEARS R/O CHIRTHANAKAILLU VILLAGE, KOSIGI MANDAL KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B S VENKATA RAMESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the respondent 2nd respondent in not taking any action on the representation of the petitioner, send through PGRS No.KUR 202510272722,dated 27-10-2025, as illegal, arbitrary, violation Articles 14,19, and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.2 to take action on the representation of the petitioner, send through PGRS No .KUR 2025510272722, dated 27-10-2025.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, would submit that, based on the complaint given by one 3 Mahalakshmi, who is the wife of the Petitioner, a case has been registered against the Petitioner. It is further submitted that, on the complaint given by the Petitioner in PGRS Grievance Cell, he was called by the Police for enquiry, however, he did not turn up. As such, the said complaint in PGRS No.KUR202510272722, dated 27.10.2023 is closed. 3. Sri B.S.Venkata Ramesh, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:18.11.2025 Dinesh 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.31577 of 2025 Dt.18.11.2025 Dinesh