Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5380 (ALL)

GANGA RAM v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

A483/26/2025 · 2025-01-27

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:13711 Court No. - 82 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 26 of 2025 Applicant :- Ganga Ram Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Shubhranshu Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 483 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Case No. 480 of 2019, arising out of case crime no. 585 of 2018, under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Faridpur, District Bareilly pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bareilly expeditiously within stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is one of the accused in the said case and same is pending since 2019. The Court concerned is not taking proper interest in disposal of the said case. In this case charges have been framed in the year 2023 but no witness has been examined so far. 4. Learned AGA opposed the prayer. 5. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 6. It reveals from the perusal of the order sheets that charges in this matter were framed in the year 2023 and since then the case is pending at the stage of evidence but no evidence is being adduced by the prosecution. In the circumstances, the Court concerned is directed to invoke the powers given to it under the law to ensure the presence of the witnesses by sending appropriate process as early as possible and make all endeavours for expeditious disposal of the case and if possible within one year and six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it, if there is no legal impediment. It is further directed that no unnecessary adjournment will be sought/granted. 7. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 8. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 27.1.2025 safi Digitally signed by :- MAHBOOB SAFI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad