CWP-12927-2025 (O&M) 131 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Bhanwar Lal State of Haryana CORAM: HON HON Present:- Mr. (presence marked through video Mr. Gaurav Bansal, Advocate and Mr. Karan Jindal, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. Ms. Ashna Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2. SUDHIR SINGH Present Writ in the nature of representation dated 31.01.2025 (Annexure P 2. At the outset, l petitioner would be satisfied, in case, 31.01.2025 (Annexure P which has not been adverted 2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH Date of decision: versus Haryana and another HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Mr. Gaurav Jaglan, Advocate for presence marked through video Mr. Gaurav Bansal, Advocate and Mr. Karan Jindal, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate and Ms. Ashna Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** SUDHIR SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present Writ Petition herein, inter alia in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to representation dated 31.01.2025 (Annexure P- At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner would be satisfied, in case, his (Annexure P-1) is considered and not been adverted to by the respondents till date. 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12927-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: May 07, 2025 ….Petitioner ….Respondents SUDHIR SINGH ALOK JAIN Advocate for the petitioner presence marked through video-conferencing). Mr. Gaurav Bansal, Advocate and Mr. Karan Jindal, Advocate for respondent No.1 – State. Ms. Ashna Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2. inter alia, is for issuance of a Writ the respondents to take action on the -1) of the petitioner. earned counsel for the petitioner submits that his pending representation dated and decided by respondent No.2, by the respondents till date. 2 2025 (O&M) , 2025 Petitioner s Writ take action on the earned counsel for the petitioner submits that dated , MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.05.12 10:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CWP-12927-2025 (O&M) 2 of 2 3. On the other hand, on advance service of copy of petition, learned counsel for the respondents appear and oppose issuance of notice of motion. They submit that grievance of the petitioner will be looked into by respondent No.2 and it shall take decision either way, on the pending representation dated 31.01.2025 (Annexure P-1) of the petitioner. 4. Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek reply by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required. 5. Without commenting on merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the pending representation dated 31.01.2025 (Annexure P-1) of the petitioner and pass an appropriate reasoned order, in accordance with law, at the earliest, preferably within a period of 08 weeks from the date of receipt of copy/ production of this order. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE May 07, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.05.12 10:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment