IN THE 113 Gurliakat Singh State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment to the post of Agriculture Sub Inspector (Soil) under General Category, with all consequential benefits. 2. rejected on 24.02.2020, Annexure P judgment dated 2017, Harwinder Singh case, the respon their merit against the posts that lying vacant 3. course of hearing, l IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Gurliakat Singh Versus f Punjab and Others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab Mr. Amarpeet Singh Bains, AAG, Punjab. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made in the present petition is for directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment to the post of Agriculture Sub Inspector (Soil) under General Category, with all consequential benefits. Learned counsel submits that claim of the petitioner has been rejected on 24.02.2020, Annexure P-3, judgment dated 05.09.2024 rendered in similar case being CWP Harwinder Singh vs. State of Punjab and others case, the respondents have been directed to consider the candidates as per their merit against the posts that lying vacant The aforesaid facts having been brought out, during the course of hearing, learned State counsel, on instructions, states that the HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12712-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 06.05.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Advocate, Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab and Mr. Amarpeet Singh Bains, AAG, Punjab. Prayer made in the present petition is for directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment to the post of Agriculture Sub Inspector (Soil) under General Category, with all s that claim of the petitioner has been 3, however, subsequently, vide 05.09.2024 rendered in similar case being CWP-758- State of Punjab and others, and connected dents have been directed to consider the candidates as per their merit against the posts that lying vacant. The aforesaid facts having been brought out, during the earned State counsel, on instructions, states that the PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.05.07 17:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-12712-2025 -2- respondents would not be averse to have a relook at the matter and decide afresh, taking note of the aforesaid judgment, within a period of 6 months, uninfluenced by the order impugned in the present case, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. 4. The aforesaid satisfies the learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. The matter stands disposed of accordingly and if the petitioner is found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same may be passed after granting opportunity of hearing to him and shall contain reasons, whereupon he shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. 06.05.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.05.07 17:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.