APHC010578302023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 29892/2023 Between: 1. MADATHANAPALLI RAMANAIAH, S/O. LATE M. RAMA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O. BOMMILINGAM VILLAGE, ARDHAVEEDU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, A.P., PIN. 523333 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE, A.P. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ARDHAVEEDU POLICE STATION, ARDHAVEEDU, ARDHAVEEDU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, A.P. 4. SMT MADATHANAPALLI BHAGYAMMA, , W/O. M. RAMANAIAH, AGED ABOUT .35 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. BOMMILINGAM VILLAGE, ARDHAVEEDU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, A.P., PIN. 523333 5. SRI GODESI RAJA KRISHNA, S/O. LATE G. PEDDA BADARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OC BUSINESS, R/O. BOMMILINGAM VILLAGE, ARDHAVEEDU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, A.P., PIN 523333 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MADHU SUDHAN P Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue an appropriate Writ, order, orders or directions more particularly one iii the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondent Authorities in registering the case on the Petitioner's complaint, dated, 03.11.2023, on the file of the Ardhaveedu Police Station, Ardhaveedu, Prakasam District, A.P., and also made a Complaint, dated 06.11.2023 through Spandana to the 2nd Respondent against the Un-Official Respondent Nos. 4 and 5, as illegal, arbitrary, biased, unconstitutionai and against the principles of natural justices and consequently, direct the 3rd Respondent to register the case on Petitioner's Complaint, dated. 03.11.2023, against the 4 and 5 Respondents, and to pass…” 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 22.11.2025 ASR