APHC010723522022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 42646 OF 2022 Between: 1. TELUGU SHIVA @ A SHIVA, S/o. Anakala Sanjeevarayudu, Aged about 58 years, R/o. D.No.1-6 B, Gangavaram Village Sirvel Mandal, Nandyal District. (previous Kurnool District.) 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary Home Department, Secretariat, Amaravati, Guntur District 2. Superintendent of Police, Nandyal District. 3. The SubDivisional Police Officer, Nandyal, Nandyal District. 4. The Station House Officer, Nandyal Taluk Po District Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue a writ of mandamus o or direction declaring the action of the respondents in opening and continuing the Rowdy Sheet No.28 dated 14.02.2014 C.no. 07/BC/SDPD against the petitioner as illegal,arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and Article IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA PETITION NO: 42646 OF 2022 1. TELUGU SHIVA @ A SHIVA, S/o. Anakala Sanjeevarayudu, Aged about 6 B, Gangavaram Village Sirvel Mandal, Nandyal District. (previous Kurnool District.) ...Petitioner AND a Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary Home Department, Secretariat, Amaravati, Guntur District 2. Superintendent of Police, Nandyal District. 3. The SubDivisional Police Officer, Nandyal, Nandyal District. 4. The Station House Officer, Nandyal Taluk Police station, Nandyal, Nandyal ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the respondents in opening and continuing the Rowdy Sheet No.28 dated 14.02.2014 C.no. 07/BC/SDPD against the petitioner as illegal,arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and Article IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 1. TELUGU SHIVA @ A SHIVA, S/o. Anakala Sanjeevarayudu, Aged about 6 B, Gangavaram Village Sirvel Mandal, Nandyal ...Petitioner a Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary Home lice station, Nandyal, Nandyal ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be r any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the respondents in opening and continuing the Rowdy Sheet No.28 dated 14.02.2014 C.no. 07/BC/SDPD-ALG/2014 against the petitioner as illegal,arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and Article 21 of the Constitution of India and to consequently direct the respondents to discontinue the rowdy sheet against the petitioner and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to call the petitioner to the 4th respondent police station under the guise of impugned rowdy sheet pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: KALANGI SUMALATHA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 42646 OF 2022 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “....may pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the respondents in opening and continuing the Rowdy Sheet No.28 dated 14.02.2014 C.no. 07/BC/SDPD-ALG/2014 against the petitioner as illegal,arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and Article 21 of the Constitution of India and to consequently direct the respondents to discontinue the rowdy sheet against the petitioner and to pass....” 2. There is no representation for the petitioner.. 3. On earlier occasion also there is no representation for the petitioner. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 5. As the petitioner is not evincing any interest to prosecute the matter, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date 28.11.2025 KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 326 W.P.No.42646 of 2022 Dt.28.11.2025 KKV HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO.: W.P.No.42646 of 2025 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 28.11.2025 Dr.VJP,J The Writ Petition is dismissed as non- prosecution. (vide separate order) ________ Dr.VJP,J KKV