APHC010556552025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] SATURDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 28724/2025 Between: 1. M SIVA RAMI REDDY, S/O. SEETHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O.H.NO.2-36, NANDIPALLI VILLAGE AND POST, BADVEL MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. GANJIKUNTA CHINNA GURAIAH, S/O. PEDDA NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. GOLLAPALLE VILLAGE, NANDIPALLI POST, B. MATTAM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. GANJIKUNTA GURAIAH, S/O. CHINNA GURAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. GOLLAPALLE VILLAGE, NANDIPALLI POST, B. MATTAM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, BADVEL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, BRAHMAMGARI MATTAM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of the Respondents in not taking any action on the representation dated 26.09.2025 as Arbitrary, Illegal, Unjust, Unreasonable, Violative Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent to adhere to procedure contemplated under law in dealing with the aforementioned report and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th Respondent herein to consider the representation dated 26.09.2025 for placing D.No’s.60 and 65 of Nagisettypalli Village, B Mattam Mandal, YSR Kadapa District., in dispute/discrepancy registrar, pending disposal of the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. S DILIP JAYA RAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 28724 OF 2025 ORDER: 1. The writ petition is filed for the following relief: “….to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of the Respondents in not taking any action on the representation dated 26.09.2025 as Arbitrary, Illegal, Unjust, Unreasonable, Violative Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent to adhere to procedure contemplated under law in dealing with the aforementioned report and pass such other order or orders…” 2. The contention of the petitioner is that the respondents ought to have implemented the Circular issued by the CCLA dt.19.03.2024 wherein the CCLA has clear instructions to the authorities that if any decree or any orders are passed by the competent civil Court or appellate authority or revisional authority, the said property should be kept in the dispute register. 3. In the instant case, on a perusal of the averments, no orders are passed by the competent civil court or appellate authority or the revisional authority under the provisions of the ROR Act. In the said circumstances, no orders need be passed in this writ petition. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. No costs. 5. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Dt.20.12.2025 BV