Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5378 (GAU)

SAYED ALI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./84/2025 · 2025-02-09

Parthivjyoti Saikia

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010002862025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./84/2025 SAYED ALI S/O MAHAR ALI VILL- DAULATPUR P.S. BIHPURIA DIST. LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M H AHMED, I AMIN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, :: BEFORE :: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA O R D E R 10.02.2025 Heard Mr. M.H. Ahmed, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also Page No.# 2/2 heard Mr. D.P. Goswami, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam. 2. This is an application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 whereby the petitioner Sayed Ali has prayed for releasing him on bail in connection with Bihpuria P.S. Case No.210/2024. 3. The allegation brought against the present petitioner is that large quantity of fake Indian Currency Notes were recovered from the house of the present petitioner. 4. Mr. Ahmed has submitted that the currency notes were actually recovered from the jungle behind the house of the present petitioner. 5. Mr. Goswami, on the other hand, submits that the fake currency notes were recovered from the house of the petitioner and the other people who were arrested in this case also supported this fact. 6. In view of the above, this Court is of the opinion that the allegation brought against the present petitioner Sayed Ali is a serious one and there are incriminating materials against him in the Case Diary. 7. Therefore, the bail application of the present petitioner is rejected and disposed of. Case Diary shall be returned. JUDGE Comparing Assistant