APHC010384392021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1776/2021 Between: 1. MALLELA SATYANARAYANA, , S/O. LATE VENKATESWARARAO, MALE, 28Y, OCC. COOLI, PONDUGALA VILLAGE, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DT. 2. MALLELA LAKSHMI, W/O. RAMA RAO, FEMALE, 53Y, HOUSE WIFE, PONDUGALA VILLAGE, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. KOUSIK, THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. B SRINIVASULU, THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NUZUVEDU, KRISHNA DT. 3. PALIVELA SRINU, THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MYLAVARAM POLICE STATION, MYLAVARAM, KRISHNA DT. 4. S VENKATESWAR, DISTRICT COLLECTOR,TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. R 4 IMPLEADED AS SUO MOTO AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 27/09/24 IN CC NO-1773 OF 2021 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Pleased to summon the Respondent herein and punish him for willful disobedience of the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court made in w.P.No. 12619 of 2020, dt. 28.7.2020 by Lordships Hon'ble Justice Smt. Kongara Vijaya Lakshmi, under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SRIDHAR TUMMALAPUDI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. V MAHESWAR REDDY 2. The Court made the following: ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 28.07.2020 passed in W.P.No.12619 of 2020. 2. Sri A.M.Haneef, learned counsel representing Sri Sridhar Thummalapudi, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that pursuant to filing of this Contempt, the respondent authorities are not interfering in the civil disputes of the petitioners, as such, the orders of this Court disobedience of which is complained of in this contempt case has been complied with, accordingly, there remains nothing for adjudication and prayed to close the contempt. 3. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 18th September, 2025 RKS