1 APHC010536572025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27908/2025 Between: 1. MANNEPALLI ADAM, MANNEPALLI ADAM, S/O POUL, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO. 2/69, (S.C.COLONY), MANDAVALLI, MANDAVALLI MANDAL ELURU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ELURU DISTRICT, ELURU. 3. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION VIGILANCE AND ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT GOVT OF A P SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATE VIGILENCE AND ENFORCEMENT DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA, N.T.R.DISTRICT. 5. THE STATE ADDITIONAL POLICE DIRECTOR GENERAL C I D, MANGALAGIRI STATE HEAD QUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. THE ANTI CORRUPTION BURO REP BY ITS DIRECTOR GENERAL DG GOVT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, VIJAYAWADA, N.T.R.DISTRICT. 7. THE ENGINEER IN CHIEF, N.H.165, VIJAYAWADA, BANDHAR ROAD, N.T.R. DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T V V KOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. S.SYAM SUNDER RAO SC cum Spl P.P. For ACB 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: 2 “.... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents not taking action on the latest Complainants/representations dated 04.09.2025. and 16.09.2025 of the petitioner to respondents Nos.4,5 and 7 is as illegal, arbitrary contrary to law. Violation of principles of natural Justice, violation of provisions of constitution of India and further direct the 4th and 5th respondents to conduct enquiry on the allegations in latest petitioner, take action as per law.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 25.11.2025 ASR 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.27908 of 2025 Dt..25.11.2025 ASR