APHC010542272023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 28121/2023 Between: 1. GAJULA SUGNA DEVI, D/O G. RAMESWARAPPA @ SRIRAMULU, HINDU, AGED 45 YEARS, CULTIVATION, RESIDENT OF H.NO.16/ 3, MADDIKERA VILLAGE MADDIKERAMANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY IT'S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATHIKONDA. KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, , PATHIKONDA RURAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MADDIKERAPOLICE STATION, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. MR SIDDININAGAMALLAPPA, S/O LATE GAJULAYERRISWAMY, HINDU, AGED 78 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, RESIDENT OF H.NO.16/2, MEDDIKERA VILLAGE MADDIKERAMANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Direction, Order or Orders more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 in interfering with the civil dispute between the Petitioner and the 5th respondent herein and preventing the Petitioner from cultivating her lands in an extent of Ac.6.00 cents in Sy.No.392/1, an extent of Ac.5.45 cents in Sy.No.526 and an extent of Ac.8.00 cents in Sy.No.144 of Maddikera East Village, MaddikeraMandal, Kurnool Districtas without power or authority, illegal, arbitrary, malafide and violation of principles of natural justice apart from violation of Article 300 (A) of Constitution of Indiaby setting aside the same and consequentially direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner with my peaceful possession and enjoyment of my above stated lands in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Otherwise, the Petitioner will be put to much hardship and irreparable loss. IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 not to interfere with thepossession and enjoyment including agricultural operations of the Petitioner in her lands in an extent of Ac.6.00 cents in Sy.No.392/1, an extent of Ac.5.45 cents in Sy.No.526 and an extent of Ac.8.00 cents in Sy.No.144 of Maddikera East Village, MaddikeraMandal, Kurnool District, pending disposal of the writ Petition in the interest of Justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to permit the petitioners to come on record as L.R’s of the deceased SiddiniNagamallappa 5th respondent as party respondents Nos.6 to 10 "i. SiddiniPullamma, ii. SiddiniSailaja, iii. SiddiniVijaya Lakshmi, iv. SiddiniBasavaRajashekar, v. SiddiniSada" in W.P.No.28121 of 2023 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A CHANDRAIH NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 28121/2023 ORDER: The writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a Writ, Direction, Order or Orders more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 in interfering with the civil dispute between the Petitioner and the 5th respondent herein and preventing the Petitioner from cultivating her lands in an extent of Ac.6.00 cents in Sy.No.392/1, an extent of Ac.5.45 cents in Sy.No.526 and an extent of Ac.8.00 cents in Sy.No.144 of Maddikera East Village, MaddikeraMandal, Kurnool District as without power or authority, illegal, arbitrary, malafide and violation of principles of natural justice apart from violation of Article 300 (A) of Constitution of Indiaby setting aside the same and consequentially direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner with my peaceful possession and enjoyment of my above stated lands in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Otherwise, the Petitioner will be put to much hardship and irreparable loss....” 2. Heard Sri A.Chandraih Naidu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that, it is a case of interference of police in civil disputes. 4. Sri V. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and unofficial respondents. 5. Learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the court may pass appropriate orders. 6. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties, except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 08.12.2025. KKV