APHC010239982021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 13788/2021 Between: 1. JAMPANI RATNA KUMARI, W/O BRAHAMA NANDAM, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, FLAT NO. 301, VAMSI ENCLAVE APARTMENTS, SAMBASIVA NAGAR, CHENNAKESAVA MANYAM, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. GOVT OF AP, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIATE BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVERNMENT OF ANDH PRADESH MANGALAGIRI, KOLANUKONDA, 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PS ONGOLE (II TOWN), KOTHAPATNAM BUS STAND, ONGOLE,PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. SRI MANNAM RAJASKEHAR, S/O SRI.M.SUBBARAO AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 5. SRI MANNAM KRISHNA KISHORE, S/O ) M.SUBBARAO AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESPONDENTS 4 AND 5 ARE RESIDING AT LINGAM GUNTA VILLAGE, MADDIPADU MANDAL PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. (RESPONDENTS 4 AND 5 ARE FORMAL PARTIES AND NO RELIEF IS SOUGHT AGAINST THEM ) ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue an order, proceeding or writ more particularly one in the nature of 'Writ of Mandamus' declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent in interfering with petitioner's life, liberty and freedom, intimidating, thr atening her, by calling her to the police station at odd hours, demanding return of promissory notes executed by the 4th and 5th Respondents and in coercing her to meet their unlawful demands and for a settlement with them, as Illegal, Arbitrary and Violative of Principles of Natural Justice and Violative of Art.14 and Art.21 of the Constitution of India and ultra vires the powers of the 3rd respondent and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere with petitioner's life, liberty and freedom, and not to summon her to the police station, unless she is required in any crime, pending adjudication of the above writ petition pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V A PADMANABHAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue an order, proceeding or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent in interfering with petitioners life, liberty and freedom, intimidating, threatening her, by calling her to the police station at odd hours, demanding return of promissory notes executed by the 4th and 5th Respondents and in coercing her to meet their unlawful demands and for a settlement with them, as Illegal, Arbitrary and Violative of Principles of Natural Justice and Violative of Art.14 and Art 21 of the Constitution of India and ultra vires the powers of the 3rd respondent and pass...…” 2. Heard Sri P.V.A.Padmanabham, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 06.10.2025 SNI 4 104 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 13788/2021 Dt.06.10.2025 SNI